|
clean and clear
agriculture
Alternative Manure Management
October 18, 2004
Printer-friendly version
| AGRICULTURE |
 |
|
Background
Imagine animal manure as a valuable resource
rather than a waste or pollutant. Through the use of alternative
manure management
technology farmers can realize many benefits from animal manure.
In the late 1800's Vermont evolved from sheep and grain
based agriculture to dairy based agriculture. Today over 80%
of Vermont's agricultural income is from the sale of
milk or beef. There are limited acres devoted entirely to fruit,
vegetables
or grain production. Because Vermont's agriculture is
dependent on livestock production, developing new methods of
manure management
is a critical component for farms to achieve compliance with
provisions of the Lake Champlain phosphorus total maximum daily
load (TMDL).
Lake Champlain has been identified as an impaired
water body and a TMDL was created in 2002 to reduce phosphorus
levels 27%
from the levels reported in 1991 (Vermont Agency of Natural
Resources, 2002). The majority of the point sources in the watershed
have
been corrected to meet the TMDL requirements, which has caused
non-point sources to contribute more (93%) of the total P load
to Lake Champlain. Currently, inputs from agriculture account
for approximately 56% of the non-point source P pollution in
Lake Champlain. In a region with a thriving agricultural community
and a high water to land ratio, providing more resources to
streams adjoining agricultural lands could provide enormous water
quality
benefits.
Development of nutrient management technology
to remove phosphorus from manure so it can be applied only
to phosphorus deficient
areas or sold to agricultural producers in need of phosphorus
is necessary to achieve the phosphorus TMDL. More than
60% of the phosphorus in dairy rations passes through the cow
unused, and into manure. Over time excess phosphorus builds
up in soils
and leaves farms through erosion and during periods of
heavy water runoff. Research is underway to fine-tune the amount
of
phosphorus required in dairy rations and develop methods
to increase uptake by animals. Farms are developing buffers
along field edges
and rotating crops on erodible soils to minimize runoff.
Until the late 1970's most farms spread manure
on a daily basis unless deep snow or heavy mud prevented passage
of spreading
equipment. As federal cost share funding became available some
farms built lagoons, (also known as pits), to hold manure during
the winter months and busy periods of the cropping season.
Lagoons were a major step forward in decreasing animal agriculture's
impact on water quality. The ability to store manure allowed
farmers to apply the nutrients in a managed fashion. Applications
could be timed to maximize nutrient use and minimize runoff.
Vermont developed a state cost share program in 1996 to augment
the federal program. Today lagoons have become a common feature
on Vermont farms. Although management of nutrients through
the use of lagoons reduces field runoff, farms are still faced
with
the dilemma of utilizing on-farm nutrients, particularly phosphorus,
in an appropriate manner.
Utilization of lagoons has created other
management challenges. Vermont developed Accepted Agricultural
Practices in 1994, which
included a prohibition on winter spreading of manure. This
coupled with increased farm size has led to larger lagoons
and manure
spreading equipment. A 6000 gallon tank of manure weighs nearly
50,000 pounds and the combined weight of the tank and tractor
can exceed 75,000 pounds. Many farms have chosen to focus their
efforts on herd and crop management and hire "custom
operators" to
spread manure in the spring, once during the summer and again
in the fall. Typically custom operators arrive at a farm according
to a set schedule and empty lagoons regardless of the weather.
Occasionally roads are subjected to frequent trips with large
equipment hauling heavy loads. Vermont's back roads do
not have sufficient base to support equipment traveling with
intensity for short time periods.
Manure stored in lagoons has a strong odor when spread. Because
farms only apply nutrients at prescribed periods during the year
significant acreage is covered in very short amounts of time.
This increases the intensity of odors. The interface between
farms and their rural neighbors is often unpleasant during manure
spreading season.
Benefits
Alternatives are being developed to address
nutrient utilization, equipment size, and odor. The benefits
of improved manure
handling
include:
 |
Figure 3. Construction of a manure digester |
A. Reduced or eliminated odor from spreading.
Experimentation with attached growth digestion shows promise
for reducing manure
odor.
B. Reduced wear-and-tear on highways. Several
methods of solids separation are being researched to decrease
the weight of over
the road equipment.
C. Organic fertilizer sources available from
the process. Utilization of various biological processes are
showing promise in the
separation of nutrient components of manure to allow development
of organic
fertilizers.
D. Power produced to reduce dependence on
fossil fuels. With new technology farms in Vermont have the flexibility
to manage
manure for nutrient control and energy production through
anaerobic digestion.
E. Producing bio-diesel from agricultural
wastes. Livestock manure can be managed to produce methanol,
used in the production of bio-diesel.
F. Reduced pathogen load applied to soils.
Several of the experimental technologies show promise of reducing
pathogen
loads in manure.
Vermont as a Center of Excellence
It is envisioned that Vermont will develop
into a center of excellence in the design and construction
of alternative manure
management technologies. A new technology showing promise allows
the separation of manure into components of varying nutrient
content to maximize nutrient utilization, decrease phosphorus
importation, allow phosphorus exportation, generate renewable
energy and minimize runoff. Known as “attached bacterial
growth,” a bacterial media is used to digest manure in
small vessels and capture the resultant methane. Digestion
eliminates odor and pathogens from the manure and the methane
can be used to offset farm energy needs. Other technologies
will be researched as they develop.
Opportunities for Private Funding Support
A combination of federal and state funds
are currently used to provide technical support and cost share
funding in the development
of alternative manure management. Additional capital is needed
to develop new technologies and to make these systems cost
effective. Specifically, private funds are needed to:
-
 |
Figure 4. Continued growth of animal agriculture in
Vermont will require development of new approaches to
manure management. |
provide capital to
companies developing alternative manure management technology,
- assist companies in development
of technology for agricultural applications, and
- decrease the financial risk
for farmers implementing new technology.
|